<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Happening To PureBlogging??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/</link>
	<description>Blogging News, Tips, &#38; Tutorials</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4479</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4479</guid>
		<description>@David I dont think having fewer bloggers is the best option. 

I of course check the schedule in the dashboard to make sure im writing on a topic that hasnt already been covered. I do think the design needs a little bit of a change. 

The writing here is top class. However, I mainly wrote this post because of the lack of team work. I think we are missing a lot of opportunities on search such as stumbleupon, digg, mixx, propeller, etc. We should also be a member of Blogburst, because articles im sure would be published. 

But that is just promotion. We also need someone dedicated to business development and advertising. 

I think Pureblogging is such a good blog it really needs to take the next step and actually become a business. Much in the same way Mashable has progressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David I dont think having fewer bloggers is the best option. </p>
<p>I of course check the schedule in the dashboard to make sure im writing on a topic that hasnt already been covered. I do think the design needs a little bit of a change. </p>
<p>The writing here is top class. However, I mainly wrote this post because of the lack of team work. I think we are missing a lot of opportunities on search such as stumbleupon, digg, mixx, propeller, etc. We should also be a member of Blogburst, because articles im sure would be published. </p>
<p>But that is just promotion. We also need someone dedicated to business development and advertising. </p>
<p>I think Pureblogging is such a good blog it really needs to take the next step and actually become a business. Much in the same way Mashable has progressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>I also haven't had a problem with organization. I'm sure there could be some room for improvement though. Like Sharon, I often look through the drafts that are saved (the titles anyway) to see what's in there. I also wouldn't be too excited to cover just one aspect. I think that could help us in some ways, but hurt in others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also haven&#8217;t had a problem with organization. I&#8217;m sure there could be some room for improvement though. Like Sharon, I often look through the drafts that are saved (the titles anyway) to see what&#8217;s in there. I also wouldn&#8217;t be too excited to cover just one aspect. I think that could help us in some ways, but hurt in others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Culpepper</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>David Culpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>Honestly... fewer bloggers is one of the changes that I am considering.  I don't particularly like the idea of letting anyone go but it is an option at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly&#8230; fewer bloggers is one of the changes that I am considering.  I don&#8217;t particularly like the idea of letting anyone go but it is an option at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Culpepper</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>David Culpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>My last comment to you should have included the words "but I know it's time for a redesign."  You are right and I know it... a complete redesign is on my list of things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last comment to you should have included the words &#8220;but I know it&#8217;s time for a redesign.&#8221;  You are right and I know it&#8230; a complete redesign is on my list of things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Steven,
I don't mind someone stating that my work isn't the best or isn't producing results. What I didn't appreciate was reading someone else's opinion that I don't care about this blog. That being said, like Michael wrote below, what's done is done.

As far as posting schedule is concerned, i have been assigned to post on Mondays. It seems to me that everyone posts the same day each week, although I can't say for sure. If there's some confusion there I'm sure we could work it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,<br />
I don&#8217;t mind someone stating that my work isn&#8217;t the best or isn&#8217;t producing results. What I didn&#8217;t appreciate was reading someone else&#8217;s opinion that I don&#8217;t care about this blog. That being said, like Michael wrote below, what&#8217;s done is done.</p>
<p>As far as posting schedule is concerned, i have been assigned to post on Mondays. It seems to me that everyone posts the same day each week, although I can&#8217;t say for sure. If there&#8217;s some confusion there I&#8217;m sure we could work it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>I don't think the discussion being in the public is necessarily a bad thing as far as results are concerned. Yes, I do feel that this discussion will bring something positive to the work that's being done here. I still, however, think that we are all supposedly working as a team we shouldn't put down others publicly without knowing more about the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the discussion being in the public is necessarily a bad thing as far as results are concerned. Yes, I do feel that this discussion will bring something positive to the work that&#8217;s being done here. I still, however, think that we are all supposedly working as a team we shouldn&#8217;t put down others publicly without knowing more about the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>It did read as though I meant to say the writing here was lame fluff, but that's not quite exactly what I meant. I was trying to warn against doing that. Not everything here is as good as it could be, but I stand by my first statement that the writing here overall is great. 

What I'm really trying to get at is that I'd love to see the blog grow, not jump the shark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did read as though I meant to say the writing here was lame fluff, but that&#8217;s not quite exactly what I meant. I was trying to warn against doing that. Not everything here is as good as it could be, but I stand by my first statement that the writing here overall is great. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really trying to get at is that I&#8217;d love to see the blog grow, not jump the shark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ott</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>Seems to me we can all play some part in promoting the site some more.

I know I can do a better job of brainstorming for keywords when I fill out WordPress's "all-in-one SEO pack." And speaking as someone who does SEO copywriting as a job, I know I can also work a bit harder at increasing the incidence of important keywords in my own posts. So there's one thing.

I'd also like the opportunity to do more videoblogging and podcasting -- but right now we don't have the proper plugins, at least for videoblogging.

I don't think I'd characterize our work as "lame fluff," but I do agree that there's really no ceiling to the quality of what we should be writing, and there's no reason we shouldn't all push ourselves a little harder. 

I may be signing my own pink slip by writing this (or worse, someone else's), but I suspect part of the problem (assuming there really is one) is that there are nine bloggers here doing what three or four could be doing. 

I have an with David to write a post per week. Since I only write one post per week, I devote a relatively small part of my week to PureBlogging. When I read &lt;a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/think-content-through/"&gt;this post on Copyblogger&lt;/a&gt; about the time it takes to create great content, a light went on in my head: fewer bloggers writing more posts would mean more time spent per individual blogger simply thinking about PureBlogging. I suspect that would make for better content.

I hope it doesn't sound like I'm angling for David to drop anyone -- actually, I think if he took my advice under serious consideration, it'd be a good idea to put me on the chopping block, since I'm not even operating my own blog right now. We're all pretty great writers, and I'm consistently amazed at the level of great content I see here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me we can all play some part in promoting the site some more.</p>
<p>I know I can do a better job of brainstorming for keywords when I fill out WordPress&#8217;s &#8220;all-in-one SEO pack.&#8221; And speaking as someone who does SEO copywriting as a job, I know I can also work a bit harder at increasing the incidence of important keywords in my own posts. So there&#8217;s one thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like the opportunity to do more videoblogging and podcasting &#8212; but right now we don&#8217;t have the proper plugins, at least for videoblogging.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d characterize our work as &#8220;lame fluff,&#8221; but I do agree that there&#8217;s really no ceiling to the quality of what we should be writing, and there&#8217;s no reason we shouldn&#8217;t all push ourselves a little harder. </p>
<p>I may be signing my own pink slip by writing this (or worse, someone else&#8217;s), but I suspect part of the problem (assuming there really is one) is that there are nine bloggers here doing what three or four could be doing. </p>
<p>I have an with David to write a post per week. Since I only write one post per week, I devote a relatively small part of my week to PureBlogging. When I read <a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/think-content-through/">this post on Copyblogger</a> about the time it takes to create great content, a light went on in my head: fewer bloggers writing more posts would mean more time spent per individual blogger simply thinking about PureBlogging. I suspect that would make for better content.</p>
<p>I hope it doesn&#8217;t sound like I&#8217;m angling for David to drop anyone &#8212; actually, I think if he took my advice under serious consideration, it&#8217;d be a good idea to put me on the chopping block, since I&#8217;m not even operating my own blog right now. We&#8217;re all pretty great writers, and I&#8217;m consistently amazed at the level of great content I see here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>It won't hurt any of you to get a little Jerry Springer action going on.

 :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t hurt any of you to get a little Jerry Springer action going on.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.pureblogging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
