<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is Happening To PureBlogging??</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/</link>
	<description>Blogging News, Tips, &#38; Tutorials</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 13:49:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4479</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4479</guid>
		<description>@David I dont think having fewer bloggers is the best option. 

I of course check the schedule in the dashboard to make sure im writing on a topic that hasnt already been covered. I do think the design needs a little bit of a change. 

The writing here is top class. However, I mainly wrote this post because of the lack of team work. I think we are missing a lot of opportunities on search such as stumbleupon, digg, mixx, propeller, etc. We should also be a member of Blogburst, because articles im sure would be published. 

But that is just promotion. We also need someone dedicated to business development and advertising. 

I think Pureblogging is such a good blog it really needs to take the next step and actually become a business. Much in the same way Mashable has progressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David I dont think having fewer bloggers is the best option. </p>
<p>I of course check the schedule in the dashboard to make sure im writing on a topic that hasnt already been covered. I do think the design needs a little bit of a change. </p>
<p>The writing here is top class. However, I mainly wrote this post because of the lack of team work. I think we are missing a lot of opportunities on search such as stumbleupon, digg, mixx, propeller, etc. We should also be a member of Blogburst, because articles im sure would be published. </p>
<p>But that is just promotion. We also need someone dedicated to business development and advertising. </p>
<p>I think Pureblogging is such a good blog it really needs to take the next step and actually become a business. Much in the same way Mashable has progressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4473</guid>
		<description>I also haven&#039;t had a problem with organization. I&#039;m sure there could be some room for improvement though. Like Sharon, I often look through the drafts that are saved (the titles anyway) to see what&#039;s in there. I also wouldn&#039;t be too excited to cover just one aspect. I think that could help us in some ways, but hurt in others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also haven&#8217;t had a problem with organization. I&#8217;m sure there could be some room for improvement though. Like Sharon, I often look through the drafts that are saved (the titles anyway) to see what&#8217;s in there. I also wouldn&#8217;t be too excited to cover just one aspect. I think that could help us in some ways, but hurt in others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Culpepper</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4471</link>
		<dc:creator>David Culpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4471</guid>
		<description>Honestly... fewer bloggers is one of the changes that I am considering.  I don&#039;t particularly like the idea of letting anyone go but it is an option at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly&#8230; fewer bloggers is one of the changes that I am considering.  I don&#8217;t particularly like the idea of letting anyone go but it is an option at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Culpepper</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>David Culpepper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>My last comment to you should have included the words &quot;but I know it&#039;s time for a redesign.&quot;  You are right and I know it... a complete redesign is on my list of things to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last comment to you should have included the words &#8220;but I know it&#8217;s time for a redesign.&#8221;  You are right and I know it&#8230; a complete redesign is on my list of things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4468</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4468</guid>
		<description>Steven,
I don&#039;t mind someone stating that my work isn&#039;t the best or isn&#039;t producing results. What I didn&#039;t appreciate was reading someone else&#039;s opinion that I don&#039;t care about this blog. That being said, like Michael wrote below, what&#039;s done is done.

As far as posting schedule is concerned, i have been assigned to post on Mondays. It seems to me that everyone posts the same day each week, although I can&#039;t say for sure. If there&#039;s some confusion there I&#039;m sure we could work it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,<br />
I don&#8217;t mind someone stating that my work isn&#8217;t the best or isn&#8217;t producing results. What I didn&#8217;t appreciate was reading someone else&#8217;s opinion that I don&#8217;t care about this blog. That being said, like Michael wrote below, what&#8217;s done is done.</p>
<p>As far as posting schedule is concerned, i have been assigned to post on Mondays. It seems to me that everyone posts the same day each week, although I can&#8217;t say for sure. If there&#8217;s some confusion there I&#8217;m sure we could work it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4467</guid>
		<description>Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Snell</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4466</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4466</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the discussion being in the public is necessarily a bad thing as far as results are concerned. Yes, I do feel that this discussion will bring something positive to the work that&#039;s being done here. I still, however, think that we are all supposedly working as a team we shouldn&#039;t put down others publicly without knowing more about the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the discussion being in the public is necessarily a bad thing as far as results are concerned. Yes, I do feel that this discussion will bring something positive to the work that&#8217;s being done here. I still, however, think that we are all supposedly working as a team we shouldn&#8217;t put down others publicly without knowing more about the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4465</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine, Blog Consultant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4465</guid>
		<description>It did read as though I meant to say the writing here was lame fluff, but that&#039;s not quite exactly what I meant. I was trying to warn against doing that. Not everything here is as good as it could be, but I stand by my first statement that the writing here overall is great. 

What I&#039;m really trying to get at is that I&#039;d love to see the blog grow, not jump the shark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It did read as though I meant to say the writing here was lame fluff, but that&#8217;s not quite exactly what I meant. I was trying to warn against doing that. Not everything here is as good as it could be, but I stand by my first statement that the writing here overall is great. </p>
<p>What I&#8217;m really trying to get at is that I&#8217;d love to see the blog grow, not jump the shark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ott</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4464</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Ott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4464</guid>
		<description>Seems to me we can all play some part in promoting the site some more.

I know I can do a better job of brainstorming for keywords when I fill out WordPress&#039;s &quot;all-in-one SEO pack.&quot; And speaking as someone who does SEO copywriting as a job, I know I can also work a bit harder at increasing the incidence of important keywords in my own posts. So there&#039;s one thing.

I&#039;d also like the opportunity to do more videoblogging and podcasting -- but right now we don&#039;t have the proper plugins, at least for videoblogging.

I don&#039;t think I&#039;d characterize our work as &quot;lame fluff,&quot; but I do agree that there&#039;s really no ceiling to the quality of what we should be writing, and there&#039;s no reason we shouldn&#039;t all push ourselves a little harder. 

I may be signing my own pink slip by writing this (or worse, someone else&#039;s), but I suspect part of the problem (assuming there really is one) is that there are nine bloggers here doing what three or four could be doing. 

I have an with David to write a post per week. Since I only write one post per week, I devote a relatively small part of my week to PureBlogging. When I read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.copyblogger.com/think-content-through/&quot;&gt;this post on Copyblogger&lt;/a&gt; about the time it takes to create great content, a light went on in my head: fewer bloggers writing more posts would mean more time spent per individual blogger simply thinking about PureBlogging. I suspect that would make for better content.

I hope it doesn&#039;t sound like I&#039;m angling for David to drop anyone -- actually, I think if he took my advice under serious consideration, it&#039;d be a good idea to put me on the chopping block, since I&#039;m not even operating my own blog right now. We&#039;re all pretty great writers, and I&#039;m consistently amazed at the level of great content I see here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me we can all play some part in promoting the site some more.</p>
<p>I know I can do a better job of brainstorming for keywords when I fill out WordPress&#8217;s &#8220;all-in-one SEO pack.&#8221; And speaking as someone who does SEO copywriting as a job, I know I can also work a bit harder at increasing the incidence of important keywords in my own posts. So there&#8217;s one thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like the opportunity to do more videoblogging and podcasting &#8212; but right now we don&#8217;t have the proper plugins, at least for videoblogging.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d characterize our work as &#8220;lame fluff,&#8221; but I do agree that there&#8217;s really no ceiling to the quality of what we should be writing, and there&#8217;s no reason we shouldn&#8217;t all push ourselves a little harder. </p>
<p>I may be signing my own pink slip by writing this (or worse, someone else&#8217;s), but I suspect part of the problem (assuming there really is one) is that there are nine bloggers here doing what three or four could be doing. </p>
<p>I have an with David to write a post per week. Since I only write one post per week, I devote a relatively small part of my week to PureBlogging. When I read <a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/think-content-through/">this post on Copyblogger</a> about the time it takes to create great content, a light went on in my head: fewer bloggers writing more posts would mean more time spent per individual blogger simply thinking about PureBlogging. I suspect that would make for better content.</p>
<p>I hope it doesn&#8217;t sound like I&#8217;m angling for David to drop anyone &#8212; actually, I think if he took my advice under serious consideration, it&#8217;d be a good idea to put me on the chopping block, since I&#8217;m not even operating my own blog right now. We&#8217;re all pretty great writers, and I&#8217;m consistently amazed at the level of great content I see here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/comment-page-1/#comment-4463</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/03/12/what-is-happening-to-pureblogging/#comment-4463</guid>
		<description>It won&#039;t hurt any of you to get a little Jerry Springer action going on.

 :twisted:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It won&#8217;t hurt any of you to get a little Jerry Springer action going on.</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.pureblogging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
