<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Has Been Playing Around With PageRanks Again!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/</link>
	<description>Blogging News, Tips, &#38; Tutorials</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 21:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: samrat</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3956</link>
		<dc:creator>samrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3956</guid>
		<description>my PR went from 0 to 3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my PR went from 0 to 3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Finch</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Finch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3809</guid>
		<description>Overall, I have had the majority of my sites stay the same. But these days PR doesnt mean too much at all. Possibly only apply for obtaining advertisers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, I have had the majority of my sites stay the same. But these days PR doesnt mean too much at all. Possibly only apply for obtaining advertisers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>We are most likely dealing with a PR update here. PageRank is definitely not nearly as important as it used to be, as G admits, but it is an important indicator potential advertisers use so that it cannot be neglected.

Alan Johnson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are most likely dealing with a PR update here. PageRank is definitely not nearly as important as it used to be, as G admits, but it is an important indicator potential advertisers use so that it cannot be neglected.</p>
<p>Alan Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamaipanese</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamaipanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>no changes for my old blogs, one of my new blogs has a pr1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no changes for my old blogs, one of my new blogs has a pr1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3796</link>
		<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3796</guid>
		<description>Yup, PR is being updated.  A couple of my sites have changed such as dailydosh.net which now has PR it didn't have previously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, PR is being updated.  A couple of my sites have changed such as dailydosh.net which now has PR it didn&#8217;t have previously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uyasar</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3795</link>
		<dc:creator>uyasar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3795</guid>
		<description>yes my pr increased from 1 to 2:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes my pr increased from 1 to 2:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Liew</title>
		<link>http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Liew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pureblogging.com/2008/01/14/google-has-been-playing-around-with-pageranks-again/#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>No changes for my blog's Page Rank but I am looking forward for better keyword ranking which I think Page Rank has little influence over it as well.

Anyway, I won't be bothered about Page Rank if they don't help me in gaining more readers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No changes for my blog&#8217;s Page Rank but I am looking forward for better keyword ranking which I think Page Rank has little influence over it as well.</p>
<p>Anyway, I won&#8217;t be bothered about Page Rank if they don&#8217;t help me in gaining more readers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
